Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- resolution-text [2024/07/29 08:28] – [New Ordinary Resolution] 202.186.187.177
+++ resolution-text [2024/08/29 04:32] (current) – 219.74.164.135
@@ Line 85: / Line 85: @@
-==== New Ordinary Resolution ====
+==== New AGM Ordinary Resolutions ====
-To empower the Management Council to appoint a Vendor/Operator to install Electric Vehicle (EV) Chargers on common property for a period of not more than 10 years.
+**AGM Resolution 1:**
+That the Management Council be mandated to:
+  * appoint a Vendor/Operator to install Electric Vehicle (EV) Chargers on common property for a period of not more than 10 years; and
+  * re-designate not more than three(3) car park lots for EV charging use
+provided that no MCST funds be used for EV Charger installation and operation.
+These requirements are advised by LTA in their EV Guide for MCSTs. See slide 10 in PDF LTA's EV Guide for MCSTs.
+Although we are currently considering to re-designate only 2 or 3 car park lots for EV charging use, I propose a higher number of 10 to cater for future expansion, should the future Council deem it desirable to do so. If EVs do take off, I envisage a possibility of installing another 2 or 3 chargers each nearer to blocks 1005 and 1007.
 ==== By-law amendment =====
-To amend the car parking by law from: \\
-“The Management reserves the right to take appropriate actions against vehicles parking **illegally** within the compound of Teresa Ville. Illegally parked cars may be wheel-clamped and an administration fee of S$50.00 will be payable to the Management for the release of the wheel-clamps.”
-To: \\
-“The Management reserves the right to take appropriate actions (including wheel-clamping) against **unauthorised** vehicle parking within the compound of Teresa Ville. An administration fee of S$50.00 will be levied for the release of the wheel-clamps.”
-A key change proposed is to address unauthorised parking instead of “illegal” ones. Currently, we have car park painted: red for residents-only; and white for visitors. For EV charging, we should paint the lots green with special EV charging logo and put a notice so that vehicles parked there are subject to the rules. Any contravention of the rules will be deemed unauthorised.
+**AGM Resolution 2:**
+To amend the car parking by law from:
+“The Management reserves the right to take appropriate actions against vehicles parking **illegally** within the compound of Teresa Ville. **Illegally** parked cars may be wheel-clamped and an administration fee of **S$50.00** will be payable to the Management for the release of the wheel-clamps.”
+To: “The Management reserves the right to take appropriate actions (including wheel-clamping) against **unauthorised** vehicle parking within the compound of Teresa Ville. An administration fee of **S$100.00** will be levied for the release of the wheel-clamps.”
+A key change proposed is to address "unauthorised" parking instead of “illegal” ones. Currently, we have car park painted: red for residents-only; and white for visitors. For EV charging, we should paint the lots green with special EV charging logo and put a notice so that vehicles parked there are subject to the rules. Any contravention of the rules will be deemed unauthorised.
+We should require the appointed Vendor/Operator to bear the costs of:
+  * re-painting the parking lots green with the standard EV charging logo.
+  * proposing a set of charging rules and instructions, and then install visible signages near the proposed lots for users.
+  * any reasonable installation/electrical changes (subject to MC approval) needed to provide the service.